Follow Prime Minister Shastri
Congrats on your Anniversary In the April issue of your esteemed thinktank magazine, you have very accurately analysed the national political scenario in the wake of the fall of the saffron brigade in the very bastion of its powerful Chief Minister Adityanath Yogi. There are clear indications now that if the Samajvadi Party under Akhiliesh Yadav and the Bahujan Samaj Party led by Mayawati remain united in the months ahead and forge a common front to fight the upcoming 2019 Lok Sabha elections, it might lead to an unprecedented defeat of the Bharatiya Janata Party led by the Narendra Modi- Amit Shah combine in Uttar
Lal Bahadur Shastri
Pradesh which sends the
largest number of Members of
Parliament to the Centre. This,
in turn, might lead to the
overthrow of the current
government at the Centre.
It has to be seen if the
Bharatiya Janata Party
leadership learns the right
lessons from its defeat in the
UP Assembly by-elections and
takes appropriate initiatives to save itself as the ruling
party. One hopes Prime Minister Modi and all his
colleagues would cease to indulge in rhetoric and rather
concentrate to deliver what their party had promised to the
people during the election of 2014 parliamentary
elections.
The record of the Modi government has been very
poor on this front so far. In his article, "Agrarian sector
on the boil," Hari Jaisingh has portrayed an accurate
national scenario on our farm sector across the country.
The Modi government would do well to pay due
attention to the long-neglected farm sector and remedy
its problems without any further delay. It must honour
the slogan the legendary Prime Minister Lal Bahadur
Shastri gave long time back --- 'Jai Kisan' ( Long live
our farmers). Shastri knew how crucial this sector is in
the life of the Indian Nation. Modi must follow him .
K Ramalingam
Chennai
Right to life with dignity
It is good that the Supreme Court
Constitution Bench has now allowed passive
euthanasia and given legal status to 'advance
directives' to this effect . It has recognised that the
right to a dignified life extends up
to the point of having a dignified
death. This judgement lays down
a broad legal framework for
protecting the dignity of a
terminally ill patient or one in a
persistent vegetative state (PVS)
with no hope of cure or recovery.
According to the court judgement,
in such circumstances, "accelerating the process of death for
reducing the period of suffering constitutes a right to live with
dignity". All adults with the capacity to give consent would
now have " the right of self determination and autonomy",
and the right to refuse medical treatment.
Passive euthanasia was recognised by a Supreme Court
Bench in 2011. Now the Constitution Bench has expanded
the jurisprudence on the subject by adding to it the principle
of a 'living will', or an advance directive, a practice whereby a
person, while in a competent state of mind, leaves written
instructions on the sort of medical treatment that may or
may not be administered in the event of reaching a stage of
terminal illness.
Passive euthanasia essentially involves withdrawal of life
support or discontinuation of life-preserving medical
treatment so that a person with a terminal illness is allowed
to die in the natural course. The court's reasoning is very
sound that burdening a dying patient with life-prolonging
treatment and equipment merely because medical
technology has advanced would be destructive of her dignity.
Mujibur Rahman
Hyderabad
Need for transparency
Nirmla Sitharaman
A section of politicians has recently
accused the Modi government of
"compromising" on national security and
causing a
loss of ₹ 12,632
crore to the state
exchequer by buying the
jets at an inflated rate.
It
alleges while 36 Rafale
jets were sold to India at
7.5 billion euros in 2016,
48 jets were sold to Qatar
and Egypt at 7.9 billion
euros in 2015. This
amounts to ₹ 1,670.70
crore per aircraft for India and ₹ 1,319.80 crore to Egypt/Qatar. There is a difference of ₹ 351 crore for
each aircraft.
The politicians have asserted if the Modi
government had not cancelled the deal struck by the
UPA dispensation for 126 Rafale jets, it could have
saved ₹ 41,212 crore. The deal under the Modi
government was signed in the absence of prior
clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security.
The Modi government , its Defence Minister Nirmla
Sitharaman in particular, must make the whole
purchase price of the systems transparent. The
government cannot keep secrecy as to how it spends
public money.
Krishnendu Chatterjee
Kanpur
Peace elusive
Kiren Rijiju
Notwithstanding
the victory of the
Bharatiya Janata
Party led him in the recent
Assembly elections in parts of the
North East, Prime Minister
Narendra Modi is losing his
credibility very fast.
The impression gaining ground
is his word does not mean much.
He has proved very inefficient in
the case of Nagaland . In August
2015 Prime Minister Modi signed the Nagaland Peace
Framework with National Socialist Council of
Nagaland (Isak-Muivah) to end the insurgency in the
region.
There is still no clarity over the Naga peace accord.
The other day Minister of State for
Home Kiren Rijiju just said to media
persons in Guwahati that several
"serious" demands had been dropped
from the agenda of the ongoing peace
talks with the Isak-Muivah faction of
National Socialist Council of Nagalim.
These included the issue of
sovereignty of the areas inhabited by
the Nagas. Rijiju claimed that the
Centre had made headway in peace
talks with other extremist groups of the
region such as United Liberation Front of Assam
(Progressive). Prime Minister Modi must see to it that
the Naga accord reaches its fruition at the earliest.
Christopher Johnson
Kohima
Panel against erring judges
An in-house committee has recently
concluded that a judge of the Allahabad
High Court had committed judicial
impropriety serious enough to warrant
his removal. The judged in question had
come under adverse notice before a Supreme Court
Bench headed by its Chief Justice last year. The Bench
found he had violated a restraining order from the apex
Court by allowing a Memorial Trust in Lucknow to admit
students. This amounted to violating judicial propriety.
The CJI then formed a three-member committee,
comprising Chief Justices of the Madras High Court,
the Sikkim High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High
Court, to examine his conduct. This committee has
found the allegation against judge substantial . The
apex court must apply the same mechanism in the
case of all such allegations. The process of removing a
judge is somewhat cumbersome. Our judiciary must act
against all erring judges.
Radhika Bose
Kolkata